Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13506 of 2013 ======================================================
1. Pramod Kumar S/O Tri Nath Yadav Resident & P.O- Alouli, P.S- Alouli, Distt- Khagaria.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through, The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, New Secretariate, Bihar, Patna.
2. The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna.
3. The Chairman Central Selection Council, New Bailey Road, Computer Bhawan, Bihar, Patna.
4. The Secretary Central Selection Council, Bailey Road, Computer, Bhawan, Patna.
5. The Commandent, Samastipur, Distt- Samastipur.
6. The S.P. Samastipur, District- Samastipur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Shashi Shekhar Kishore For the State : Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AAG-13 Mr. Tej Pratap Singh, Advocate For C.S.B.C. : Mr. Sanjay Pandey Mr. Binod Kumar Mishra, Advocate Mr. Vivek Anand Amtritebh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-11-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has applied for the post of constable (Bihar Police) against the advertisement No. 01 of 2004. As per the claim of the petitioner, he qualified in the physical test, but he has wrongly been deprived of the post of constable. In the counter affidavit in sub-paragraph (b) of paragraph No. (ii) of paragraph No. 5, it has been stated that the
Patna High Court CWJC No.13506 of 2013 (3) dt.17-11-2016 2/2 petitioner has obtained less than the minimum cut off marks and, as such, he has not been selected so much so that this matter relates to the said advertisement, all the selection has been made and whatever the vacancy is left out, the same will be consumed in another advertisement.
In such view of the matter, this Court does not find any merit. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. (Shivaji Pandey, J) ajaypd./- U