Pratima Devi v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14604 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1446 Year- 2015 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- JAMUI ====================================================== Pratima Devi, wife of Jaganath Ravidas @ Jagarnath Ravidas, resident of Village- Etaun, P.S. Chanan, District- Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Pramod Das, S/o Shyam Ravidas, resident of Village- Karra, P.S.- Laxmipur, District- Jamui.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Prasad, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehta, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Complaint Case No. 1446(C) of 2015 instituted for the offence under Sections 120(B) and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is wife of Jangarnath Ravidas. From the complaint petition it is apparent that assurance for employment was given by the husband of the petitioner and amount was allegedly taken by the husband of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14604 of 2018 (2) dt.27-03-2018 2/2 six weeks from today, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1446(C) of 2015, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Lalan Kumar, learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Jamui, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438

(2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T