Patna High CourtCWJC/9096/2019dismissed

Dr. C. P. Thakur College v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-21Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9096 of 2019 ====================================================== Dr. C. P. Thakur College, Chechaul, Naubatpur through its Secretary, Shree Dinanath Singh, son of Late Hridaya Narayan Singh, Resident of Village-Chechaul, Police Station-Naubatpur in the District of Patna.

.. ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Joint Secretary, Higher Education Bihar, Patna.

4. The Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya through its Registrar.

5. The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya in the District of Gaya.

6. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya in the district of Gaya.

7. The Patliputra University, Patna through its Registrar.

8. The Vice Chancellor, Patliputra University, Patna.

9. The Registrar, Patliputra University, Patna. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Aditya Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Madhaw Prasad Yadav, GP-23 Mr. Arvind Kumar, AC to GP-23 For the Magadh University :

Mr. Om Prakash Kumar, Advocate For the Patliputra University :

Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 21-08-2023 Mr. Aditya Kumar, learned counsel on instruction from Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned Advocate on Record of the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed.

2. Mr. Om Prakash Kumar, learned counsel for the Magadh University, Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, learned counsel for the Patliputra University and Mr. Madhaw Pd. Yadav, learned GP-23 assisted by Mr. Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the State are present.

3. This writ application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) SUSHMA2/- U