Pahadi Bind @ Chandradeo Bind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27907 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2025 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Pahadi Bind @ Chandradeo Bind Son of Late Baleshwar Bind Resident Of Village- Matiya Mohanpur Ps- Laxmipur District- Jamui 2.

Ajay Bind Son of Pahadi Bind @ Chandradeo Bind Resident Of VillageMatiya Mohanpur Ps- Laxmipur District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Prakash Parasar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 275 of 2025 dated 28.10.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 74, 351(2), 191(2), 191(3), 127(2), 126(2), 117(2), 118(1)(2), 115(2), 109(1), 190 and 303(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners were part of an unlawful assembly in which the co-accused persons Indradeo Bind, Manish Bind and Mtriyunjay Bind assaulted the informant and her son.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27907 of 2026(2) dt.29-04-2026 2/2 this case. It has further been submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties and there is no allegation of assault against these petitioners. The petitioner No.1 has been made accused earlier in three other cases in which he is on bail in all the cases while petitioner No.2 has been made accused in two other cases in which he is on bail in both the cases.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Heard the parties and perused the record, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Jamui in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 275 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Praveen Kumar, J) shivam/- U T