Raj Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.749 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2022 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.
RAJ KUMAR MAHTO SON OF LATE LAHWAR MAHTO R/O VILLAGE- JHAJHWA, P.S.- MANJHAGARH, DISTRICT- GOPALGANJ 2.
BACCHA SAH SON OF UMA SAH R/O VILLAGE- JHAJHWA, P.S.- MANJHAGARH, DISTRICT- GOPALGANJ 3.
PANKAJ PRASAD @ PANKAJ KUMAR SON OF SANTOSH PRASAD R/O VILLAGE- JHAJHWA, P.S.- MANJHAGARH, DISTRICTGOPALGANJ ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVT. OF BIHAR BIHAR 2.
THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GOPALGANJ BIHAR 3.
THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SADAR, GOPALGANJ BIHAR 4.
THE S.H.O. MANJHAGARH POLICE STATION, GOPALGANJ BIHAR 5.
HARENDRA SINGH SON OF LATE HARIBANSH SINGH R/O VILLAGE- JHAJHWA, P.S.- MANJHAGARH, DISTRICT- GOPALGANJ ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajeev Ranjan For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh For the State :
Mr. Arvind Ujjawal, SC 4 Mr. Vatsal Verma, AC to SC 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-04-2025 Heard the parties.
2. This application has been filed for quashing the FIR bearing Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 178 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.749 of 2023(5) dt.17-04-2025 2/2
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pressed this application mainly relying on the application filed by the informant saying that the informant has filed the present FIR because of previous enmity.
4. In the opinion of this Court, it appears that the petitioner is tampering with the evidence.
5. The investigation is going on and I am not inclined to quash the present FIR because of the application filed by the informant.
6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
7. The Police is directed to conclude the investigation at the earliest, preferably within six months from today.
8. The status report of the case produced by Mr. Arvind Ujjawal is taken on record.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U