Md. Nezamuddin @ Md. Kalamuddin v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26622 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2024 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Md. Nezamuddin @ Md. Kalamuddin Son of Md. Kaleem @ Md. Alim Resident of Village- Taralahi, P.S.- Bahadurpur, Dist.- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.N A Shamsi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324 and 153A of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the Choukidar with whom he is on an inimical term. It is next submitted that the informant (Choukidar) alleges that on 22-1-2024, a mob suddenly appeared near Shanti Chowk, and started creating ruckus, and some unknown accused started pelting stones on the house of Girdhari Thakur on account of which he became injured. It is further alleged that the Chaukidar identified some of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26622 of 2024(2) dt.08-05-2024 2/2 accused persons, namely Md. Kalamuddin (petitioner), Md. Azim, Md. Bhola and Md. Eqbal in the mob, while 5-7 accused fled and when informant tried to pacify the matter, they entered into a scuffle with him. The learned counsel submits that allegations are general and omnibus in nature, though it is alleged that petitioner pelted stones causing injury, but then the parties have compromised.

4.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 21 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T