← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6535/2014dismissed

Radha Krishna Tiwari v. Bindeshwari Tiwari And ORS

2016-01-29Mr. Justice Mungeshwar Sahoo3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6535 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Radha Krishna Tiwari Son Of Sri Ram Tiwari Resident Of Village - Nainijore, Police Station - Brahmpur, District - Buxar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Bindeshwari Tiwari Son Of Ram Brichh Tiwary

2. Ashok Tiwary Son Of Shyam Deo Tiwary

3. Vinay Tiwary Son Of Shyam Deo Tiwary

4. Binod Tiwary Son Of Shyam Deo Tiwary

5. Brij Bihari Tiwary Son Of Ram Ahga Tiwary

6. Sukhdeo Tiwary Son Of Ram Cheese Tiwary All 1 To 6 Are Resident Of Village - Bagohi, And At Presently Residing At Belhari, P.S. Haldi, P.O. Rudrapur, District - Balia ( U.P. )

7. Gitanjali Kuer Wife Of Late Kamlesh Tiwary

8. Santosh Tiwary Son Of Late Kamlesh Tiwary

9. Raju Tiwary Son Of Late Kamlesh Tiwary

10. Tuntun Tiwary Son Of Late Kamlesh Tiwary

11. Byasmuni Tiwary Son Of Late Ram Balak Tiwary

12. Sidhnath Tiwary Son Of Jagdish Tiwary

13. Jaigovind Tiwary Son Of Shiv Prasad Tiwary

14. Ram Behari Tiwary Son Of Rajgrihi Tiwary

15. Behari Pandey Son Of Yadunandan Pandey

16. Gopi Pandey Son Of Vashishth Pandey

17. Indrasan Pandey Son Of Sunder Pandey

18. Kashinath Tiwary Son Of Ram Jatan Tiwary

19. Rama Shankar Tiwary Son Of Parsuram Tiwary

20. Shyam Bihari Tiwary Son Of Kailash Tiwary

21. Radha Krishna Tiwary Son Of Sri Ram Tiwary

22. Ram Rekha Tiwary Son Of Deo Dutt Tiwary

23. Nagma Yadav Son Of Ram Bachan Yadav

24. Radha Krishna Yadav Son Of Ram Bachan Yadav

25. Ram Govind Yadav Son Of Richhan Yadav

26. Ishwar Dayal Yadav Son Of Richhan Yadav

27. Brahmdeo Pandey Son Of Kailash Pandey

28. Raj Narayan Pandey Son Of Mahesh Pandey

29. Naresh Pandey Son Of Mahesh Pandey

30. Jhhakad Pandey Son Of Dhani Pandey

31. Baijnath Pandey Son Of Ganesh Pandey

32. Mohan Pandey Son Of Sunder Pandey

33. Rajgrihee Tiwary Son Of Liladhar Tiwary

34. Brij Bihari Tiwary Son Of Late Radha Tiwary

35. Tej Narayan Tiwary Son Of Late Adalat Tiwary

36. Shivjee Tiwary Son Of Late Adalat Tiwary

37. Kishun Dutt Tiwary Son Of Late Adalat Tiwary

38. Raj Narayan Tiwary Son Of Late Raj Ballav Tiwary

39. Bhim Tiwary Son Of Late Raj Ballav Tiwary

40. Lallan Tiwary Son Of Late Raj Ballav Tiwary

41. Manu Tiwary Son Of Late Raj Ballav Tiwary

42. Siya Ram Tiwary Son Of Vasudev Tiwary

43. Lal Mohar Tiwary Son Of Dhokal Tiwary

44. Dharam Nath Tiwary Son Of Jagdayal Tiwary

45. Mahabir Tiwary Son Of Dhokal Tiwary

46. Thakur Tiwary Son Of Dhokal Tiwary

47. Ramji Tiwary Son Of Deodhari Tiwary

48. Rang Nath Tiwary Son Of Deodhari Tiwary

49. Jangli Tiwary Son Of Late Manohar Tiwary

50. Vishambhar Tiwary Son Of Late Manohar Tiwary

51. Chhathu Tiwary Son Of Raja Tiwary All 7 To 51 Are Resident Of Village - Nainijore, Police Station - Brahmpur, District - Buxar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Roy For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO ORAL ORDER 29-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

By the impugned order dated 24.01.2014, learned Munsif, 1st, Buxar decided the preliminary issue with respect to valuation of the suit property and recorded a finding that the suit is within the pecuniary jurisdiction of the said court in T.S. No. 226 of 1993.

From perusal of the impugned order dated 24.01.2014, it appears that the court below, after consideration of the evidences of both the parties, which were adduced in support of their respective case of their valuation, recorded a clear finding that the defendants failed to prove the valuation of the suit property beyond the jurisdiction of the court. In view of the aforesaid fact, this finding of fact in

exercise of supervisory jurisdiction cannot be interfered with as this Court is not exercising the appellate nor revisional jurisdiction. Thus, this writ application is dismissed. (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J) brajesh/- U