Lalbabu Ram v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34087 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1757 Year- 2015 Thana -WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- WESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Lalbabu Ram Son of Late Sakaldeo Ram, R/o Village- Nawalpur, P.S.- Nawalpur, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Anita Devi, W/o Lalbabu Ram, D/o Motlal Ram, R/o VillageNawalpur, P.S.- Nawalpur, District- West Champaran. At present Resident of Village- Gandhi nagar, P.S.- Bagaha, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Trial No. 1141/2016, arising out of Complaint Case No. 1757 (C) of 2015 for the offences instituted under Sections 323 and 498(A) of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the complainant due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34087 of 2017 (2) dt.20-07-2017 2/2 tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The case is triable by the Magistrate. He has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Tr. No. 1141/2016, arising out of Complaint Case No.

1757C/2015 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., West Champaran at Bettiah, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K.