Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31345/2026bail granted

Md. Danish @ Md. Danish Rza v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-15Mr. Justice Kumar Manish3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31345 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-240 Year-2025 Thana- JALALGARH District- Purnia ====================================================== Md. Danish @ Md. Danish Rza S/o Md. Nazim R/o Village - Jianganj, P.S - Kasba, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Madhav Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KUMAR MANISH ORAL ORDER 15-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. This is an application for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in connection with Complaint Case No.2536 of 2025 converted into Jalalgarh P.S. Case No. 240 of 2025 dated 28.11.2025, registered for offences punishable under Sections 89, 64, 351(2), 352 of BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation is that the petitioner is the neighbour of the victim and he began to make physical relationship with her by making false promise of marriage and thereafter she became pregnant and when she told him for marriage with her, he denied and got her pregnancy aborted. It has been further alleged that the petitioner demanded dowry of Rs. 4 lakhs for marriage and they also threatened

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31345 of 2026(3) dt.15-07-2026 2/3 family members of the informant. Hence the F.I.R. was instituted.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case and the petitioner has raised the serious doubt of the genuineness of the prosecution story as no any specific date and time of the alleged occurrence has been mentioned by the informant in this case and there is no medical evidence or electronic evidence against the petitioner to show the involvement of the petitioner and moreover as per the allegation in the F.I.R. the relationship between the informant and petitioner is consensual and no case under Section 376 is made out against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 30.01.2026, having clean antecedent.

5. The learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Purnea, in connection

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31345 of 2026(3) dt.15-07-2026 3/3 with Complaint Case No.2536 of 2025 converted into Jalalgarh P.S. Case No. 240 of 2025, subject to following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors should be family member of the petitioner.

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in the trial and will remain present on all dates personally or should be duly represented through his counsel and whenever required to be physically present by the court, he should physically appear in the Court on that date.

(iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Kumar Manish, J) sanjeev/- U T