Munna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5626 of 2026 ====================================================== Munna Kumar Son of Shree Ram Kumar Ray, Resident of Village- Pali, Police Station- Bihta, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Secretary Mines and Minerals Department, Government of Bihar at Patna.
2.
The Director, Mines and Mineral Department, Government of Bihar at Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate, District Bhojpur at Ara. 4.
The District Mining Officer cum Mine Development Officer, District Bhojpur at Ara.
5.
The Mining Inspector, District Bhojpur at Ara. 6.
The Senior Superintendent of Police, District Bhojpur at Ara. 7.
The Officer In Charge of Bihta Police Station, District Bhojpur at Ara. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Niraj Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Government Advocate 2 For the Mines :
Ms. Shruti Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 14-05-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is allowed to make necessary corrections in the list of respondents inasmuch as instead of the place Bhojpur at Ara it has been recorded as Patna at Patna.
2. The present petition has been preferred for: "(i) for issue a writ most probably of the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to release the vehicle (Truck) bearing registration no.- BR01GQ4668, Chassis no.-MAT466395G5 D06934;
(ii) for grant of any other relief/reliefs for which
Patna High Court CWJC No.5626 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026 2/2 Petitioner is found entitled under the fact and circumstances of the case."
3. Ms. Shruti Singh, learned counsel for the Mines Department submits that that the petitioner can move before the Mineral Development Officer, Bhojpur for the redressal of the grievance as also his claim.
4. Concerning the aforesaid facts, it is observed that if the petitioner prefers the petition before the Mineral Development Officer, Bhojpur in next four weeks, he/she is duty bound to take the matter to its logical conclusion within a period of eight weeks thereafter.
5. Since the truck has been seized on 07.03.2026 and is under the sky, the authorities are duty bound to ensure that the time frame allowed must be taken note of while disposing of the petition.
6. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/ S. Prasad U