Raghvendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20247 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Raghvendra Thakur, son of Late Jaideo Thakur, Resident of Village Gosain Tol, Gram Panchayat Patwara, P.S. Rajnagar, District- Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Secretary, Department of Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga

5. District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Madhubani

6. Additional Collector, Madhubani

7. The District Programme Officer (Education), Madhubani

8. Sub Divisional Officer, Madhubani

9. Superintendent of Police, Madhubani

10. Circle Officer, Rajnagar, District- Madhubani

11. Officer Incharge, Rajnagar Police Station, District Madhubani

12. Indradeo Yadav son of Late Ram Khelawan Yadav

13. Bishundeo Yadav son of Late Mahavir Yadav null

14. Ram Sundar Yadav son of Late Parmeshwar Yadav

15. Shyam Sundar Yadav son of Late Parmeshwar Yadav

16. Kapileshwar Yadav son of Late Ram Prakash Yadav

17. Dukhi Yadav son of Late Ram Prakash Yadav

18. Ram Lakhan Yadav son of Late Jivachh Yadav

19. Ram Sarowar Yadav son of late Jaleshwar Yadav All resident of village Gosain Tol Patwara, P.S. Rajnagar, District Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Adv. Md. Imteyaz Ahmad, Adv.

Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha GA-1. Ms. Aditi Sansaria, AC to GA-1.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 19-09-2016 Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, learned Government Advocate No.1, appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.20247 of 2014 (4) dt.19-09-2016 2/2 State-respondents.

In view of the fact that according to the counter affidavit filed by the State-respondents, the encroachment from the land, in question, which forms the subject-matter of this Public Interest Litigation, has already been removed, the proceedings of this Public Interest Litigation is closed with liberty given to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari,CJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) K.C.jha/- U