Alamgir Ansari @ Satan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24908 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-682 Year-2022 Thana- JOGAPATTI District- West Champaran ====================================================== ALAMGIR ANSARI @ SATAN SON OF JAUWAD HUSSAIN R/O DEWAN TOLI, MACHHARGAWAN BAZAR, P.S.- YOGAPATI, DISTRICT- WEST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pronoti Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 23-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 379, 412, 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is that from his possession a stolen motorcycle has recovered. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner has apprehended on spot. He submitted that both parties are co-villagers and there is dispute with regard to the money/loan of Rs. 30,000/-, which was given by the petitioner to his next door neighbour Sandeep Kumar also two bags of rice was given to him during Covid-19 pandemic period after, the sitaution became normal the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24908 of 2023(2) dt.23-05-2023 2/2 demanded his money as well as rice the motive of the next door neighbor Sandeep Kumar was not fair and he has refused to repay the loan but the rice was returned by him. When the petitioner putting pressure to return his money, he has implicated in a planted case. He further submitted that no one have claimed about the ownership of the vehicle, which is said to be stolen one. He is languishing in judicial custody since 12.12.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Jogapatti P.S. Case No. 682 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T