Raghuveer Thakur @ Renu Thakur v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35791 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -856 Year- 2015 Thana -BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Raghuveer Thakur @ Renu Thakur Son of Nand Kishore Thakur Resident of Village- Balu Tola Ekchari Diyara, Police Station- Ekchari Diyara, District- Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Kajal Devi Wife of Raghuveer Thakur, Renu Thakur, D/o Sri Subhash Thakur At Present Resident of Village- Sanokhar, Police Station- Sanokhar, District- Bhagalpur.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Shamimul Hoda For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 856/2015, for the offence instituted under Sections 420, 468, 471, 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of D.P. Act, but the cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of D.P. Act. The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35791 of 2017 (02) dt.10-08-2017 2/2 petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 856/2015 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bhagalpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T