Ravindra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.748 of 2015 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10486 of 2014 =========================================================== Ravindra Kumar, son of Late Radhamadhav Prasad, resident of Maranga, P.S.- Maranga, District- Purnea, proprietor Chitranse Rice Mill, Purnea. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Food & Consumer Protection Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation, Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

4. The Deputy Chief (Claim), the Bihar State Food & Civil Supply Corporation, Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

5. The District Magistrate, Purnea.

6. The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation, Purnea.

7. The Area Manager, FCI, Purnea .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 23-12-2016 The present Letters Patent Appeal is directed against an order passed by the learned Single Bench of this Court on 23.07.2014 in C.W.J.C No. 10486 of 2014 deciding the writ application in light of the order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 9133 of 2014 (M/s Shivam Mini Modern Rice Mill vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) decided on 22.07.2014.

2. L.P.A. No. 1709 of 2014 against the said judgment stands decided vide judgment reported as Arvind Kumar vs. State of Bihar, 2015(4) PLJR 422.

Patna High Court LPA No.748 of 2015 dt.23-12-2016 2/2

3. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the appellant that the order passed in Letters Patent Appeal has since been partly modified on 23rd of August, 2016 in Civil Review No. 150 of 2015 (Rohit Rice Mill vs. The State of Bihar and Ors).

4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we find that the matter in issue is covered by the Arvind Kumar's case (supra).

5. The appeal is decided in terms of the said judgment and as modified by this Court in Civil Review No. 150 of 2015 (Rohit Rice Mill vs. The State of Bihar and Ors.) decided on 23rd of August, 2016. (Hemant Gupta, ACJ) (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) P.K.P.

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 09.01.2017 Transmission Date