Bijai Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50466 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -212 Year- 2015 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Bijai Sahni, son of Sahdeo Sahni, Resident of Village- Gober Sahin, Police Station- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mazharul Hassan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. L.K.Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 212 of 2015 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Panel Code.
As per prosecution case, the informant received information that his daughter Nitu Devi has been burnt to death and her dead body has been vanished. The informant got his daughter Nitu Devi married with Bijay Sahni in the year 2012 and she has one son. She came to her Maika and she went to her
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50466 of 2015 (4) dt.09-02-2016 2/3 sasural on the marriage of her Nanad. Informant's son-in-law and his brother were always demanding Motor Cycle and threatening to kill her. When the informant came at the house of his daughter, no one was there and he alleged that her daughter has been burnt by sprinkling kerosene oil.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. From perusal of paras 17, 18 and 19 of the case diary, it would appear that the independent witnesses have stated that it was an accidental death while the deceased was cooking.
On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that though the petitioner is the husband of the deceased but the independent witnesses, who have been examined, do not support the prosecution case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 212 of 2015, on subject to
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50466 of 2015 (4) dt.09-02-2016 3/3 the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J.) ajaypd./- U T