Manjusa Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29833 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Manjusa Kumari wife of Ramesh Ram village- Gunjar Bigha, p.s.-Jamhor, Dist- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Amit Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-04-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(1), 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a women and allegation is of recovery of 03 liters of liquor from a motorcycle.
4. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from her conscious possession and she came to be implicated based on the fact that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29833 of 2024(2) dt.22-04-2024 2/3 she is owner of the seized vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against herself and hence would get implicated. It is next submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that her brother-in-law Sikandar would misuse the vehicle in a manner as alleged as he was also apprehended from the spot.
5. The learned APP for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge,IInd, Aurangabad in connection with Excise P.S. Case No.119 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, in that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29833 of 2024(2) dt.22-04-2024 3/3 event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect.
8. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T