Patali Yadav @ Potali Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15227 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -5 Year- 2016 Thana -SANGRAMPUR District- MUNGER ====================================================== Patali Yadav @ Potaliya Yadav S/o Shaymsunder Yadav, R/o VillageBichh Chahar, P.S.- Teliya Bamber, District- .... .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 12-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 05 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is not named in the written report. One Pappu Yadav with stolen vehicle (Bolero) was arrested and he has disclosed the name of this petitioner. There is no recovery of any article from possession of this petitioner.

It is mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15227 of 2018 (2) dt.12-04-2018 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 05 of 2016, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IInd, Munger, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T