Kunal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23837 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-470 Year-2019 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== KUNAL KUMAR Son of Raushan Singh Resident of Village- Bari Aghu, Mohan Aghu, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 16-10-2020 As of now, the Courts have not resumed normal physical hearing. The matter has been listed today for consideration through Video Conferencing.

Learned counsel are appearing and making submissions from their residence. The Court master and Secretary are also part of this virtual Court proceedings with the aid of audio visual technology.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honor his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defects as pointed out by office when called upon.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23837 of 2020(2) dt.16-10-2020 2/2 Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case no. 470 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 414, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a)/41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018.

Mr. Bipin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be approaching the Court below for grant of regular bail by raising the submission that recovery is from near the orchard of Ram Swaroop Yadav which the petitioner has no concern and that his implication is false merely on the basis of the fact that he has criminal antecedents in this regard. In view of such submission, the application is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court below for grant of regular bail which, needless to say, would be considered by the Court below without holding rejection of the anticipatory application against the petitioner, while considering his prayer for regular bail.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) shyambihari/- U T