← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/113/2009disposed

Purnanand Jha v. The Bihar State Co Opt.Land De

2024-01-16Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.113 of 2009 ====================================================== Purnanand Jha, son of late Bhawanand Jha, Resident of Flat No. 602, Uday Giri Apartment, Budh Marg, Patna, P.S.- Kotwali (Patna), District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Bihar State Cooperative Land Development Bank Ltd. Budh Marg, Patna, through its Chairman.

2.

The Chairman, Bihar State Cooperative Land Development Bank Ltd. Budh Marg, Patna, 3.

The Managing Director, The Bihar State Cooperative Land Development Bank Ltd. Budh Marg, Patna, 4.

The Incharge Senior Account Officer, Bihar State Cooperative Land Development Bank Ltd. Budh Marg, Patna, 5.

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Patna at Patna, District- Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Birendra Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rajesh Pd.Choudhary, Advocate Mr. Shyama Kant Singh, Advocate For Respondent no.5 :

Mr. Jai Prakash Verma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 16-01-2024 Heard Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Jai Prakash Verma, learned counsel for respondent no.9 and Mr. Shyama Kant Singh, learned counsel for Bihar State Cooperative Land Development Bank Ltd.

2. It has been informed to this Court that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner on being advised has preferred an appeal against the order, as contained in Memo No. 128 dated 31.07.2008, passed by the Managing Director, Bihar State Cooperative Land Development Bank Ltd., Patna

Patna High Court CWJC No.113 of 2009 dt.16-01-2024 2/2 whereby and whereunder the petitioner (appellant) has been inflicted with the punishment that half of the not recovered loan amount related to three loanee members (Tractor and other equipment's), which comes to Rs.12,86,264/-, as per calculation, loss caused to the Bank shall be realized from the petitioner.

3. It is submitted on behalf of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties that the aforenoted appeal is pending consideration before the Appellate Authority and the next date of hearing is scheduled to be fixed on 20.01.2024.

4.Considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and the development, as has taken place, during the pendency of this case, the present writ petition stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to pursue his appeal and in case of any adverse order, he shall be at liberty to approach before the appropriate forum/Court in accordance with law.

(Harish Kumar, J) uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 18.01.2024 Transmission Date NA