← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24177/2025bail granted

Ranjan Singh @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-03Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24177 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2024 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- West Champaran ====================================================== Ranjan Singh @ Ranjan Kumar S/O Baidya Nath Singh @ Baidyanath Singh R/O Vill.- Ward no.15, Barwat Pasrain, P.S.- Bettiah Mufassil, Dist.- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Kumari Khushi Raj @ Khushi Raj W/O Ranjan Singh @ Ranjan Kumar, D/O Samir Kumar Presently R/O Vill.- Raidhurwa, P.S.- Manuapool O.P., Dist.- West Champaran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Gupta For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Complainant :

Mr. Sachida Nand Rai Mr. Avinash Raj ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for O.P. No. 2.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 156C of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120(b), 341, 342, 323, 354(b), 498(A), 313, 504, 506/34 of the IPC.

3. It is a case of matrimonial dispute.

4. Vide order dated 01.05.2025, the matter was referred to the Patna High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The report of the learned Mediator shows that the matter could not be resolved between the parties and therefore, the mediation failed.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24177 of 2025(4) dt.03-11-2025 2/2 the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedent. He has submitted further that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 4,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Complaint Case No. 156C of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./ 482(2) of the BNSS.

7. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 4,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2 (the complainant). The interim maintenance will be subject to any other order granted by any other Court of competent jurisdiction granting maintenance to Opposite Party No. 2 (the complainant).

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) priyanka/- U T