← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/1858/2023allowed

Sonu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-03Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1858 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2022 Thana- RAJPUR District- Buxar ====================================================== Sonu Singh Son Of Baban Singh Resident Of Village - Uttampur, P.S.- Rajpur, District - Buxar.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Rajeev Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 03-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special P.P for the State.

The appellant has challenged the order dated 14.03.2023 passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Buxar in connection with Rajpur P.S. Case No. 86 of 2022 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 447, 323, 307, 349 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act whereby his prayer for being released on bail has been rejected.

It is a case of commission of opening fire by the

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1858 of 2023(4) dt.03-08-2023 2/3 appellant and other accused persons as a result of which, the informant and his cousin sustained gunshot injuries. The accused persons also abused the informant and others by calling their caste name.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that appellant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. The occurrence did not take place in public view. Hence, the provision under SC/ST Act would not be attracted against the appellant. Moreover, good sense has prevailed between the parties and both sides have compromised the matter. The compromise petition has been annexed as Annexure-2 to the petition. The appellant is in custody since 05.02.2023.

Learned Special P.P appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant.

Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court deems it appropriate to set aside the order dated

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1858 of 2023(4) dt.03-08-2023 3/3 14.03.2023.

Accordingly, this appeal is allowed.

The appellant, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Buxar in connection with Rajpur P.S. Case No. 86 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T