Md. Irshad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34589 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1369 Year-2013 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Araria ====================================================== MD. IRSHAD S/o Late Masebul Resident of Village- Jahangeer Tola, Ward No.18, P.S. and District- Araria. . ... ... Petitioner.
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Bibi Jahan Ara W/o- Md. Irshad D/o Tabrez @ Md. Tabrez Alam Resident of Village- Jahangeer Tola, P.S. and District- Araria. ... ... Opposite Parties.
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Md. Naushad Uzzoha For the Opposite Parties :
Mr. Umesh Lal Verma Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no2., is said to have ousted the opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor drove her out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over the demand of dowry. He is still ready to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34589 of 2021(6) dt.29-06-2022 2/2 keep her with full honour and dignity. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 opposing the prayer for bail submitted that petitioner is not paying Rs.2,000/- as ordered by the learned Court below. In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No.1369/2013, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the learned Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Center for the purpose of reconciliation or for one time settlement.
Accordingly, this application stands disposed of. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T