Dinesh Kumar Khoorpiwala v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19618 of 2014 ====================================================== Dinesh Kumar Khoorpiwala Son of Akhileswar Prasad Singh Resident of Old Lal Kothi,Alkapuri More,P.S-Gardanibagh,District-Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The High Court of Judicature At Patna through the Registrar General, Patna High Court, Patna

5. The State Election Commission, Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Dinesh Kr. @ Khoorpiwala, Advocate For the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Mr. Anjani Kumar, A.A.G.-6 For respondent No.4 : Mr. Mrigank Mauli, Advocate Mr. Sanket, Advocate Mr. Prince Kr. Mishra, Advocate For respondent No.5 : Mr. Amit Srivastava, Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 08-02-2016 Heard Mr. Dinesh Kr. @ Khoorpiwala, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, and Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned Additional Advocate General No.6, appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Also heard Mr. Mrigank Mauli, learned Counsel, appearing for respondent No.4, and Mr. Amit Srivastava, learned Counsel, appearing for respondent No.5. After some arguments, Mr. Dinesh Kr. @ Khoorpiwala, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner,

Patna High Court CWJC No.19618 of 2014 (4) dt.08-02-2016 2/2 seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach the competent authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Hemant Gupta, J) Sunil/- U