Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26840/2025disposed

Kunkun Mandal @ Kunkun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-14Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26840 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2024 Thana- Tetiyabumber District- Munger ====================================================== Kunkun Mandal @ Kunkun Kumar Son of Chitranjan Mandal VillageBhalguri PS- Tetiya Bamber Distt -Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Kamal Nayan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 14-05-2025 Heard Mr. Kumar Kamal Nayan, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Tetiyabumber P.S. Case No. 38 of 2024 for the offence registered under sections 323, 341, 325, 307, 504, 506, 34 of IPC lodged on 20.06.2024 by the informant, Urmila Devi.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on the issue of the entry of cow in the field, the alleged assault took place in which Urmila Devi @ Sadhana Devi was attacked by the petitioner on her head which led to fracture. The son, Pritam Kumar was assaulted by Tirth Narayan Mandal by iron rod on his head while father-in-law, Kailash Mandal was assaulted by Chitranjan Mandal. Allegation of assault is also on the head of her sister-in-law, Soni Devi by the accused persons

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26840 of 2025(2) dt.14-05-2025 2/2 making her unconscious, they were shifted to Primary Health Centre and then to Mayaganj Hospital, Bhagalpur. This followed the FIR.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is case and counter case and both side have sustained injuries.

5. Learned APP on the other hand opposes the prayer submitting that perusal of the FIR would show that this petitioner assaulted the informant which was found to be grievous in nature.

6. Considering the submissions of the parties and the injury that has been inflicted on the informant by the petitioner, no relief can be granted.

7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U T