Bishwanath Da @ Lulha @ Bishwanath Murmu @ Shushil Murmu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34784 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2010 Thana- KAJRA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Bishwanath Da @ Lulha @ Bishwanath Murmu @ Shushil Murmu Son of Late Somar Murmu Resident of Village Chhoti Madhuwan Haweli Kharagpur, P.S. - Haweli Kharagpur, District - Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Indu Bhushan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-09-2021 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing.

Heard both parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in Kajra P.S. Case No. 33 of 2010, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 302 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code, section 27 of the Arms Act and section 17 of the CLA Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has been named in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Binod Kumar Marandi who has been granted bail by this Hon'ble Court vide annexure3. Several similarly situated co-accused have been granted by by different benches of this Court. Petitioner is in custody since

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34784 of 2021(3) dt.14-09-2021 2/2 20.12.2020. Investigation is complete.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Lakhisarai in connection with Kajra P.S. Case No. 33 of 2010, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below. (ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T