Shankar Sah @ Shankar Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25153 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-778 Year-2021 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.
Shankar Sah @ Shankar Kumar Sah Son Of Upendra Prasad Sah @ Upendra Sah R/O Village- Sahugarh Janki Tola, P.S. And District- Madhepura 2.
Sanjay Sah @ Sanjay Kumar Sah Son Of Late Satyendra Sah @ Late Satyadeo Sah R/O Village- Sahugarh Janki Tola, P.S. And DistrictMadhepura 3.
Mohit Kumar Son Of Sanjay Sah R/O Village- Sahugarh Janki Tola, P.S. And District- Madhepura 4.
Rakesh Kumar Son Of Shankar Sah R/O Village- Sahugarh Janki Tola, P.S. And District- Madhepura 5.
Sudhir Kumar @ Sudhir Sah Son Of Late Satyadeo Sah R/O VillageSahugarh Janki Tola, P.S. And District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Amarnath Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh For the informant :
Mr Kamal Kishor Singh Mr. Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners nos. 1, 2, 4 & 5 apprehending their arrest in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case no. 778 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per allegation in the FIR, the accused persons including the petitioners encircled the informant and assaulted with Farsa due to which he sustained injury on head.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25153 of 2022(3) dt.11-10-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case due to old land dispute. There is no specific allegations against the petitioners. They have got no criminal antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the state and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Madehpura P.S. Case no.
778 of 2021, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Madehpura subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.