← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25066/2022bail granted

Arvind Kumar @ Arbind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-10Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25066 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-317 Year-2021 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

ARVIND KUMAR @ ARBIND KUMAR SON OF KRISHNA AH 2.

RUPESH KUMAR SON OF SATYA NARAYAN SAHANI 3.

SEEMA DEVI WIFE OF DINESH MANJHI All R/O VILLAGE - UJJAIN LOHIYAR, P.S. - HARSIDHI, DISTRICT - EAST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kundan Rathore @ Kundan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners no. 1 and 2 has antecedent of one case and petitioner no. 3 is a person with clean antecedent.

The informant alleges that Chandan Kumar fraudulently executed the sale deed of the land of the informant by changing Khata and Khesra number of the land to the petitioners.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25066 of 2022(2) dt.10-11-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent purchasers. It is further submitted that if what has been alleged in the FIR is true then the informant has remedy available in law i.e. of getting the sale deed cancelled.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Govindganj (Areraj) P.S. Case No. 317 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T