Bajrangi Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25111 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2021 Thana- NATHNAGAR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== BAJRANGI DAS SON OF LATE SURESH DAS R/O VILLAGEMANOHARPUR (SAHJADPUR), P.S.- MADHU SUDANPUR, DISTRICTBHAGALPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 30-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State through virtual mode in view of COVID-19.

The case is registered under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Nath Nagar (Madhu Sudanpur) P.S. Case No. 336 of 2021.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that Suraj Kumar and Bajrangi Das used to run a Tempo together. Bajrangi Das had taken a loan of Rs. 12,000/- from Suraj Kumar. On the fateful day both took dinner left together but on the next morning, while Bajrangi Das was found in an subconscious state, Suraj Kumar dead at Bajranghi Das' house and accordingly the FIR was lodged.

In this matter, case diary was called for on 04.08.2022.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25111 of 2022(3) dt.30-09-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has falsely been implicated in the matter in fact he was friend of the deceased and had carried him to his home. Both of them became unconscious although Suraj Kumar did not survive and only because the fact that he had taken a loan of Rs. 12,000/- he has been implicated in this case.

Per contra, learned APP submits that perusal of different paragraphs of the case diary clearly shows along with supervision note points finger towards him and as such he does not deserve bail.

Considering the materials that has come in the case diary, this Court for the present is not inclined to grant privilege of bail and the bail application is accordingly rejected. (Rajiv Roy, J) Prakash Narayan /- U T