Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29083/2024bail rejected

Chandan Kumar @ Goriya v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-21Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29083 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-737 Year-2020 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Chandan Kumar @ Goriya Son of Late Saryug Paswan Resident of Subhash Chowk (Ambedkar Colony), P.S.- Town Thana Hajipur, Dist.- Vaishali, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vasant Vikas, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No.737 of 2020.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued vehemently for sometime. On query of the Court as to whether charges have been framed or not, on which the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner fairly submits that charges till date has not been framed.

4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner thereafter continued with his argument at a vehement pace, but then realizing his difficulty seeks permission to withdraw the bail application with liberty to renew his prayer

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29083 of 2024(2) dt.21-09-2024 2/2 for bail after framing of charge.

5. Permission is accorded.

6. It is made clear that petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer after framing of charge and if the charges are not framed within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before the learned trial court, in that event also the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T