← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/544/2022disposed

Samir Chandra Suman v. The State Of Bihar Through The District Magistrate, East Champaran

2026-06-18Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.544 of 2022 ====================================================== Samir Chandra Suman, S/o Harendra Prasad @ Harendra Prasad Shrivastava, R/o village- Phenhara, P.S.- Phenhara, Distt.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, East Champaran 2.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran 3.

The Superintendent of Police, East Champaran 4.

The Dy. S.P., Pakridayal, East Champaran 5.

The S.H.O., Phenhara P.S., East Champaran 6.

The Circle Officer, Phenhara, East Champaran 7.

The S.D.O, Pakridayal, East Champaran 8.

The Sub Divisional Magistrate, East Champaran 9.

Ramadhar Prasad Yadav @ Ramadhar Rai, S/o Sakhichand Rai, R/o villageGovindbara, P.S.- Phenhara, Distt.- East Champaran ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Aishwarya Shankar, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-06-2026 The present writ petition has been preferred for issuing direction to Private Respondents for restraining from doing any construction work at his house/parcel of land, which, as a matter of claim, belongs to the petitioner. The petitioner has also sought direction to the official respondents for restraining the private respondent from torturing or misbehaving with the petitioner and his family members and giving threats.

2. The present writ petition is not admitted till date.

3. Heard on the point of maintainability.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.544 of 2022(6) dt.18-06-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly concedes that there is efficacious alternative remedy available to the petitioner by way of filing appropriate civil suit before competent civil court for restraining the private respondents from doing any construction work and he has also remedy to initiate criminal proceedings against the private person if he extends any threat or commits any criminal misconduct.

5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take legal remedy as available to him as per law.

(Jitendra Kumar, J) S.Ali/- U T