Kamrul Hoda @ Md. Kamrul Hoda v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23181 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-325 Year-2024 Thana- RAMGARHWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Kamrul Hoda @ Md. Kamrul Hoda Son of Arkan Miyan Resident of Village - Belahiya, P.S.- Ramgarhwa, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ram Adya Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 02-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Ramgarhwa P.S. Case No. 325 of 2024, dated 19.12.2024, lodged under Section 8(C), 20(B)ii C and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
3. As per the prosecution, total recovery of 287.55 kg (two quintals, 87 kg, and 55 grams) of ganja has been made, which is the subject matter of the present case.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further submits that the petitioner's name has figured in this case by virtue of the confessional statement of the co-accused, who
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23181 of 2025(3) dt.02-07-2025 2/2 disclosed that the said ganja belongs to one Ekram Mian and, on his instruction, he used to carry the said ganja from one place to another. Counsel further submits that the recovery has not been made from the petitioner's possession. He also submits that the antecedent of the petitioner is clean and he is ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever may be imposed upon him.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that, from the seizure list, it transpires that the recovery has been made from the petitioner's house. The seized quantity is 287.55 kg, which is much more than the commercial quantity.
6. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Aman Kumar/- U T