Patna High CourtL.P.A/1486/2012dismissed

Radhakant Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2015-08-21Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Navaniti Prasad Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No 1486 of 2012 =========================================================== Radhakant Singh Son Of Late Hiya Lal Singh Resident Of Village - Khajurkorama, P.S. Rajoun, District - Patna .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Collector, Banka

3. The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Banka, Through Its Member

4. Member, District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Banka

5. Block Development Officer, Rajoun, Dist - Banka

6. Block Education Officer, Rajoun, Distt- Banka

7. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Sakhara, P.S. Rajoun, Distt - Banka

8. The Panchayat Sevak, Gram Panchayat Raj, Sakhara, P.S. Rajoun, Dist - Banka

9. Rajesh Mandal Son Of Narsingh Mandal Resident Of Village - Laskari, P.O. - Laskari, Dist - Rajoun, Dist - Banka .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH And HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH) Date: 21-08-2015 IA No 6236 of 2012 has been filed by the appellant for condoning the delay in filing the appeal.

2 For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

3 IA No 6236 of 2012 stands disposed of.

4 Inspite of repeated calls, no one appears for the appellant who was the writ petitioner.

5 After perusing the order of the learned Single Judge, we

Patna High Court LPA No.1486 of 2012 dt.21-08-2015 are not inclined to interfere inasmuch as the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority refused to entertain the application which was filed after delay of more than two years challenging the non-selection of the writ petitioner-appellant. The learned Single Judge also, in view of the aforesaid fact, refused to entertain the writ petition.

6 We see no reason to take a different view of the matter. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) U M.E.H./-