Jitendra Sahani v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.45411 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -879 Year- 2016 Thana -VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Jitendra Sahani, S/O Kaleshwar Sahani, R/V- Bandey Bishanpur, P.S. Patori, District-Samastipur.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Asha Devi, W/O Jitendra Sahani, R/V- Bishanpur, Bandey, P.S. Patori, District-Samastipur. At present of Village- Paranpur, P.S. Tisiouta, District-Vaishali.
.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar Lal, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh 1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A) of the IPC and 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.
The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45411 of 2017 (5) dt.14-12-2017 2/2 case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Complaint Case No. C1-879 of 2016/ T.R. No. 2966 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T