Yogendra Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13317 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2017 Thana -KISHUNPUR District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Yogendra Yadav,

2. Ramendra Yadav,

3. Vijay Yadav All Sons of Late Ram Charan Yadav,

4. Sanjeet Kumar S/o Yogendra Yadav, All R/o village and Post - Andauli Tola, Baijnathpur, P.S.- Kishanpur, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Purushottam Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-04-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 06 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 353, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is of misbehaving with the Government Officials, who had gone to remove the encroachments.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that only general and omnibus allegation has been levelled and no specific allegation has been levelled against the petitioner. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13317 of 2018 (2) dt.05-04-2018 2/2 the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 06 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T