Shailendra Kumar Singh @ Shailendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24031 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-287 Year-2025 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== Shailendra Kumar Singh @ Shailendra Singh Son of Keshav Singh Resident of village-Kausar, PS-Raghunathpur, District-Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Renuka Ratnakar (App 125) For the Informant :
Mr. Chandra Kant, Adv.
:
Mr. Navin Kumar, Adv.
:
Ms. Karnika Sristi Kumar, Adv.
:
Mr. Subhash Kumar Tiwari, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Raghunathpur Police Station Case No. 287 of 2025, disclosing offences under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner, along with his son and others, restrained the informant's son and, upon the petitioner's instigation, his son stabbed the victim in the chest with intent to kill.
4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24031 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/2 present case with only a vague allegation of instigation and no case made out under Sections 109 and 103 BNS. There is delay of four days in lodging the FIR. Injuries are simple in nature as per the injury report of PHC, Siwan, and the victim died due to lack of proper treatment. There is previous land and political dispute between the parties. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent.
5. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the gravity of offence and the fact that the petitioner is named in the FIR, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail.
6. This application is, accordingly, rejected. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) HarshPandey/- U T