Kamal Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23587 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2019 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Kamal Sharma, aged about 55 years, male, Son of Late Prem Sharma, Resident of Village - Bhagta Tola, Daulatpur, P.S.- Raghopur, Distt.- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kamal Kishore Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anish Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354 (B), 379, 504, 506 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner. There is general and omnibus allegation and there is land dispute between both parties and for this reason, free fighting took place between the parties as a result of which case and counter case.
The petitioner is in custody since 14.01.2019. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23587 of 2019(3) dt.26-06-2019 2/2 the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Birpur in connection with Raghopur P. S. Case No. 9 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:
(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother brother, sister and/or his wife.
(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.
(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T