Juri Yadav @ Juri Lal Yadav @ Jori Lal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25256 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2020 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

Juri Yadav @ Juri Lal Yadav @ Jori Lal Yadav Son Of Late Dhani Lal Yadav R/O Village- Malahanama, Ward No.-13, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul 2.

Harilal Yadav Son Of Khattar Yadav R/O Village- Malahanama, Ward No.- 13, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul 3.

Ashok Yadav Son Of Khattar Yadav R/O Village- Malahanama, Ward No.- 13, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul 4.

Subodh Yadav Son Of Khattar Yadav R/O Village- Malahanama, Ward No.- 13, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul 5.

Chandeshwari Yadav Son Of Late Ram Prasad Yadav R/O VillageMalahanama, Ward No.-13, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul 6.

Khushilal Yadav Son Of Bhagwan Dat Yadav R/O Village- Malahanama, Ward No.-13, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul 7.

Kapleshwar Yadav Son Of Late Ram Prasad Yadav R/O VillageMalahanama, Ward No.-13, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 144, 149, 342, 447, 341, 323, 354(B), 324, 325, 308 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Prevention of Witch Practices (Dayan) Act, 1999.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25256 of 2022(2) dt.11-10-2022 2/2 Allegedly, it is a case of assault upon the informant, due to which she sustained injuries.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both parties have sustained injuries, as alleged, in separate occurrence.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM-I, Supaul in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 258 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T