Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12503/2011dismissed

Syed Quasul Haque And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar And ANR.

2015-02-06Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 12503 of 2011 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -8 Year- 2010 Thana -Bihar DistrictNALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ========================================================

1. Syed Quasul Haque, Son of late Abdul Haque, Resident of New Colony, Matkuriya Road, Wasseypur, Dhanbad (Jharkhand).

2. Syed Taj-ul Haque, Son of late Abhdul Haque, Resident of Officers Colony, Wasseypur, Dhanbad (Jharkhand).

3. yed Nishat Ahmad, Son of Syed Israil Ahmad, Resident of Qamar Makhdoomi Road, Wasseypur, Dhanbad (Jharkhand).

4. Md. Ashraf Son of late Abul Hassan, Resident of Panchaiti Akhara, Police Station-Kotwali, Gaya (Bihar).

5. Shamima Khatoon, Wife of Md. Ashraf, Resident of Panchaiti Akhara, Police Station-Kotwali, Gaya (Bihar).

6. Nasra Khatoon, Wife late Syed Faizul Haque, Resident of Officers Colony, Wasseypur, Dhanbad (Jharkhand)..... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Shahda Farhat, Daughter of Izharul Haque, Resident of Dumranwa, Police Station-Asthama, District-Nalanda.

3. Nasrin Farhat, D/o Ijaharul Hque, W/o Syed Quasul Haque, Resident of Dumranwa, P.S.-Asthama, Dist.-Nalanda, Biharsharif, At present Kagji Muhalla, P.S.+Distt.-Biharshariff..... .... Opposite Party/s ======================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. S.D. Singh Yadav, APP. ======================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-02-2015 No one appears on behalf of the Petitioners.

The Petitioners seek quashing of the order of cognizance dated 04.02.2011 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Bihar P.S. Case No. 08 of 2010. It appears that at one point in time the Petitioner No. 1 had undertaken but there is no instruction as to whether the Petitioner had deposited the entire arrears of maintenance as directed by the Court below. Hence, the Application is dismissed. The Court below shall take strict action against the accused persons.

(Anjana Prakash, J) Vikash/- U T