← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28547/2016bail granted

Amit Kumar @ Amit Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2016-07-25Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28547 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -60 Year- 2016 Thana -MUFFASIL District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Amit Kumar @ Amit Paswan, Son of Vijay Paswan, resident of VillageJhikatia, P.S. Muffasil Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar No.3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Muffasil Aurangabad P.S. Case No. 60 of 2016 registered for offence under Sections 341, 323, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

There is a case and counter case from both sides. Allegation has been made against the petitioner and Rohit Paswan that both jointly assaulted the Informant. The injury report shows that the injury is simple in nature.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Amit Kumar @ Amit Paswan, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28547 of 2016 (2) dt.25-07-2016 period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad Muffasil P.S. Case No. 60 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been cancelled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T