Sandeep Kumar @ Pahalwan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27012 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2024 Thana- SHANKARPUR District- Madhepura ====================================================== Sandeep Kumar @ Pahalwan S/O Upendra Yadav Resident of VillageKabiyahi, Ward No. 11, P.S. Shankarpur, District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Ruchi Mandal For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Shankarpur P.S. Case No. 88 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 506/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, it has been alleged that when the informant was returning to his house, in the midst thereof this petitioner along with two unknown persons who had concealed their faces with clothes fired upon the informant. The informant somehow ducked himself and hence he was saved.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been alleged that there is delay in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27012 of 2026(3) dt.13-05-2026 2/2 lodging the FIR and the story as projected by the informant is an improbable one. It has further been submitted that no marks of violence were found at the place of occurrence. It has further been submitted that petitioner is in custody since 01.10.2024. Chargesheet has been filed and there is no allegation of tampering against the petitioner. It has further been submitted that although petitioner has been made accused in eleven other cases but is on bail on those cases.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the parties and taking into account the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, in connection with Shankarpur P.S. Case No. 88 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Praveen Kumar, J) niku/- U T