Mano Devi And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34066 of 2017 (2) dt.20-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34066 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -293 Year- 2014 Thana -GAYA COMPLAINT CASE District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Mano Devi

2. Krishna Choudhary .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

State of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Braj Nandan Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 20-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Complaint Case No. 293 of 2014 instituted for the offence under Sections-420, 465 of the Indian Penal Code.

There is allegation in the complaint petition that petitioner No. 2 who is husband of the complainant in conspiracy with petitioner No. 1 who is second wife has got the amount of Rs. 7500/- received as bonus of LIC, credited in his account by opening fictitious account in PNB in the name of Tara Devi. In the complaint petition, it is alleged that the date of occurrence is 26-11-2013 whereas; the complaint has been filed on 24-02-2014 i.e. after about 3 months. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34066 of 2017 (2) dt.20-07-2017 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 293 of 2014 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateXI, Gaya subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T