Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25663/2020allowed

Pappu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-09-29Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25663 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2020 Thana- KURTHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Pappu Kumar Son of Kapil Yadav Resident of Village- Erki, P.S. and DistrictJehanabad ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Paras Nath, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-09-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State through Video Conferencing.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner and other accused persons, named in the FIR, are alleged to have enticed away informant's minor daughter Anu Kumari aged about 17 years.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He refers to section 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the victim in which she has admitted that she had gone to Himachal Pradesh with the petitioner at her own sweet will. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 20.2.2020. In the facts of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner mentioned above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arwal in Kurtha Police Station Case No. 16 of 2020 on the following conditions:-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25663 of 2020(2) dt.29-09-2020 2/2

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T