Kedar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31893 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2024 Thana- Sarbahada District- Gaya ====================================================== Kedar Yadav S/o Raj Kumar Yadav R/o Village- Bhawanibhgha, P.S.- Sarbahada, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binod Murari Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sarbahada P.S. Case No. 66 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, the accused persons including the petitioner assaulted the informant with iron rod and lathi and snatched Rs. 5000/- and silver bala.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31893 of 2025(3) dt.18-07-2025 2/2 also submits that the allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties. The petitioner is in custody since 11.12.2024 and has got four criminal antecedents in which he is on bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that similarly situated co-accused has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 20.02.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 8760 of 2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sarbahada P.S. Case No. 66 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T