Brajesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6844 of 2022 ====================================================== Brajesh Rai S/o Gorakh Rai R/o- Chailwa, P.O. and P.S.- Gopalpur, DistrictGopalganj and at present holding Pax Chairman of Chailwa Pax Authorities P.S. Gopalpur, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
The Chief Secretary Govt. of Bihar at Patna.
3.
The Director in Chief Health Services Bihar Patna. 4.
The Principle Secretary Health Department Govt. of Bihar at Patna. 5.
The Regional Deputy Director Health Services Saran at Chapra. 6.
The District Magistrate Gopalganj.
7.
The Civil Surgeon Cum Chief Medical Officer Gopalganj Sadar Hospital Gopalganj.
8.
The Deputy Superintendent of Gopalganj Sadar Hospital Gopalganj. 9.
Dr. Shyam Sunder Kuma Incharge Medical Officer cum drawing and disbursing Officer Kuchai Kote Health Centre/ Hospital Kuchai Kote, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jitendra Kumar Shrivastwa,Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.S.D. Yadav (AAG9) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) 01-07-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): "By way of this writ petition through writ of mandamus petitioner pray in the light of pubic interest directing the State Government
Patna High Court CWJC No.6844 of 2022(2) dt.01-07-2022 2/2 through their official. Health department to followed to norms and guideline and direction of posting of D.D.O. and Incharge of Medical Officer or Incharge of any of the Centre or institution and donate. The respondent no. 9 and made appointment of Senior persons."
After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not in favour of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that the petitioner shall be content if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum and to take recourse to such other alternate remedies which are equally efficacious in law. Prayer allowed.
The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/-DKS U