Satya Narain Thakur And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31969 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1119 Year- 2016 Thana -SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Satya Narain Thakur, Son of Late Jimdar Thakur,

2. Krishna Nandan Thakur @ Krishna Nandan Kumar Son of Satya Narain Thakur,

3. Jhinguriya Devi, W/o Satya Narain Thakur, All are Resident of VillageRewasi, P.S.- Riga, District- Sitamarhi.

4. Punita Devi, W/o Damodar Thakur, Resident of Village- Chhorahiya, P.S.- Sahiyara, District- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Rekha Devi, W/o Ram Babu Thakur, D/o Ram Pukar Thakur, Resident of Village- Nara Lama, P.S.- Riga, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 06-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. C-1/1119/2016 registered under Sections 341, 323, 379, 498A, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioner nos. 1 and 3 are father-in-law and mother-in-law, petitioner no. 2 is dewar and petitioner no. 4 is married Nanad of the complainant. They have falsely been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31969 of 2017 (3) dt.06-10-2017 2/2 implicated in this case.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Sitamarhi in connection with Complaint Case No. C-1/1119 of 2016, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Arvind Srivastava, J) Shailendra/- U T