Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25599 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2014 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Thakur Son of Babu Lal Thakur Resident of village - Basantpur, Chainpur, P.S.- Sahebganj, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-05-2025 1.

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Sahebganj PS case no. 204 of 2014 dated 25.07.2014, disclosing offences punishable under Section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

The prosecution story, as per the First Information Report, is that on 22.07.2014 at about 10.30 hours, while the informant was sitting at his door, he saw that his next door neighbour namely Ramlal Thakur was getting the land measured. It is alleged that when the informant objected to the wrong measurement of the land, accused Manoj Thakur started abusing him. When the father of the informant intervened scuffle took place between both sides. Accused Manoj Thakur hit with iron rod on the head of informant's father with an

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25599 of 2025(2) dt.07-05-2025 2/2 intention to kill him. As far as the petitioner is concerned, it is alleged that he tightened the informant's neck with towel and took away Rs. 2,000/- from his pocket. It is also alleged that he along with other accused persons threw the informant into the well.

4.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that false and fabricated allegations have been levelled against the petitioner and he has not committed any offence in the manner alleged. A case and counter case is going on between the parties. Learned counsel further submits that present occurrence took place due to land dispute between both sides. 5.

Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the F.I.R. as well as impugned order, which clearly shows that the petitioner has caused grievous injury to the informant by tying his neck with towel and he along with others threw the informant in to the well, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6.

This application is, accordingly, rejected.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) rinkee/- U T