Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35082/2021bail rejected

Ajit Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2022-10-10Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35082 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2021 Thana- PATORI District- Samastipur ====================================================== AJIT PASWAN Son of Sukhdev Paswan Resident of Village - Karimnagar Kachahari Gali, P.S.- Mohiuddinagar, District - Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mahendra Pratap For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-10-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Patori (Mohanpur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 22 of 2021 registered for punishable under Sections 147, 148, 447, 448, 341, 323, 324, 354, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation, the named accused persons, including the petitioner entered into the house of Sheela Devi, the informant. The petitioner Ajit Paswan inflicted Garasa blow with intention to kill her, which hit at her mouth resulting into

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35082 of 2021(5) dt.10-10-2022 2/2 slit of her lips and her teeth were broken. Co-accused Shiv Paswan assaulted Ravi Paswan, son of the informant. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the altercation took place on trivial issue of quarrel between the children of both the parties. The specific allegation against the petitioner Ajit Paswan is that he inflicted Garasa blow on the person of Sheela Devi, who has sustained one grievous injury. In my view, it is not a fit case for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, it is rejected.

If the petitioner surrenders before the court below and makes a prayer for regular bail that shall be disposed of without being prejudiced by this order.

Office shall ensure that all defects are moved by the petitioner within the stipulated time mentioned hereinabove, failing which, the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/Mahesh U T