← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27375/2024bail granted

Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-10Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27375 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2024 Thana- PUSA District- Samastipur ====================================================== Ravi Kumar, Son of Raj Kishor Sahni @ Raj Kishor Choudhary Resident of Village- Ward No.-11, Malikaur, P.S.- Pusa, Dist.- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amar Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Nazir Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-04-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the allegation is of recovery of 90 litres of liquor from a fallow land of the petitioner.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and from bare perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that the liquor is alleged to have been recovered from the barren land

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27375 of 2024(2) dt.10-04-2024 2/3 of the petitioner. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own land for committing a crime and thus, would create evidence against himself and hence, would get implicated. It is also submitted that it appears that someone inimical to the petitioner, got the liquor planted on his fallow land leading to his implication by the Chaukidar based on suspicion, when admittedly petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise-1, Samastipur in connection with Pusa P. S. Case No.23 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27375 of 2024(2) dt.10-04-2024 3/3 found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, in that event, the present anticipatory bail application shall not be given effect to.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T