← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29200/2025bail granted

Madan Dom v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-07Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29200 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-1995 Thana- KARPI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Madan Dom son of Badri Dom village- Kolaha, Ps- Karpi, Dist- Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mayank Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 07-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The present bail petition has been filed by the petitioner due to misuse of his bail granted by the Trial Court wherein the petitioner is not attending the trial dated 09.04.2024.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation as levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 24.11.2024 and he has got clean antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition.

5. Perused the First Information Report and the impugned order dated 21.01.2025, it appears that this is a case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29200 of 2025(2) dt.07-05-2025 2/2 of misuse of bail. Petitioner is absent from the Trial Court since 09.04.2024 and the learned Trial Court has cancelled the bail bond of the petitioner and thereafter the petitioner was arrested by the police on 24.11.2024, so considering all these aspects of the matter and submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District Judge-I, Arwal @ Jehanabad in P.S. Case No. 63 of 1995 ,P.S. Karpi, Arwal Sessions Trial No.157 of 2019, GR No. 1298 of 1995, Trial No.778 of 2019 with following condition:- The petitioner shall remain physically present before the Trial Court till conclusion of the trial and if the petitioner is not present on each and every date fixed by the trial Court, the bail bond of the petitioner shall be cancelled and the learned trial Court shall take appropriate steps, in accordance with law. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Harshita/- U T