← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23832/2025bail granted

Shankar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-03Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23832 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-371 Year-2008 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Shankar Singh Son of Ram Vriksh Singh R/O Ward No 12, Adarsh, lakshmipur, Kalyanpur, Lakhisarai, Bihar-811302 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Uma Devi wife of Vishambhar Singh village- Damodarpur, Ps- Lakhisarai, Dist- Lakhisarai ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Shanu, Adv.

Mr. Shubham, Adv.

Mr. Ranvir Pratap Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Despite the valid service of notice, the opposite party no. 2 did not choose to appear whereas learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State are in appearance.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 371C of 2008, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 385, 323 and 342 of the IPC.

3. According to allegation, the petitioner and other coaccused persons having kidnapped the complainant's son at the point of pistol, took him to village Laxmipur where he (petitioner) got solemnized marriage of his daughter with the complainant's son.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The marriage of the complainant's son has been solemnized

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23832 of 2025(7) dt.03-12-2025 2/2 elsewhere and the marriage of the petitioner's daughter has also been solemnized. He has further submitted that notices were sent to the complainant, but no one appeared on her behalf. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedent.

5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class/concerned Court, Lakhisarai in connection with Complaint Case No. 371C of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the CrPC/482(2) of the BNSS, 2023. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T